EXCERPTED FROM EXHIBIT BBB

From Appeal Transcript Case No. 2006-P-0285
Maryfrances Cassell v. Christian Science Board of Directors
(which Appellant Robinson transcribed for Appellant: Ms. Cassell)

From Transcript Page 91 . . .

31. [Atty Dinsmoor] May it please the Court, I’m Ted Dinsmoor, and I am Counsel to the Appellees, the Christian Science Board of Directors.

32. The Supreme Judicial Court has on at least three prior occasions reviewed Mrs. Eddy’s 1892 deed of trust and the various quit claim deeds and indentures that she authored and executed in 1904 and 1906 which effectively modified or amend the 1892 deed of trust. [here the critical and independent “1903 Deed of Trust Contract” is deceptively left out ; and there were no deeds in 1906].

33. In all three occasions in initially the case of Case v. Dickey, then in the case of Crout Hall v. Attorney General, both decided back in the 1918-1920 period, and then more recently in the case of Weaver v. Wood, the SJC has held that the 1892 deed of trust creates a public charitable trust. [Not!]

34. And it would appear that the argument that is being made on appeal here is simply that the SJC [Supreme Judicial Court] was wrong in its legal conclusions.

[Chief Justice Perretta] Or it may be time for them to change their mind . . .

[Atty Dinsmoor] I beg your pardon?

[Chief Justice Perretta] Or it may be time for them to change their mind . . .