Exhibit RR
"Orwellian Newspeak"

1. In a recent Bulletin from the Christian Science Board of Directors, the Directors are saying that they "look for new ways to put the resources of the 14-acre Christian Science Plaza to their most effective use... by moving the activities of both the twenty-six story Administration building and the 5-story elongated Church Colonnade building into the Christian Science Publish House."

2. In a recent news release, the Chairman of the Christian Science Board of Directors, Nathan Talbot, stated erroneously that "the Christian Science Publishing Society is a wholly owned subsidiary of The Mother Church," and that the textbook of Christian Science, Science and Health with Key to the Scriptures, by Mary Baker Eddy, is "the landmark work on spirituality and healing," making no reference to Science and Health as being a textbook, nor as providing the Key to the Scriptures.

3. According to the Boston Globe . . .

"The First Church of Christ, Scientist plans to redevelop portions of its 14-acre property in Boston's Back Bay, including the possible construction of new buildings, as it looks to unload space and make money on its prime location.

"The Directors are soliciting proposals from urban planners and architects concerning the addition of secular office, retail or residential space on the largely open block between the Prudential Center and Symphony Hall in Back Bay.

"The spacious campus is governed by a special institutional zoning plan that allows new structures of up to 75 feet tall, and in some cases up to 115 feet tall, but Barbara Burley, the church's senior manager of Real Estate planning and operations expects the final proposals to be for bigger buildings in excess of those height restriction."

"The 500 remaining employees of the church will be housed in the nine floor Publishing House building on Massachusetts Avenue."

4. Why would the opinions of neighbors and the public be heeded rather than the wisdom of faithful students of Mary Baker Eddy who own the property, and have not given their approval of said plans to destroy the symbolism of Mary Baker Eddy's Cause?