Exhibit TTT The First Amendment Does Not Countenance Brute Force On
The Part Of Church Officials
1. Even if the Church were considered hierarchical -- which it is not-- civil
courts could take jurisdiction of this controversy.
2. The First Amendment
does not require blind deference of the courts to ecclesiastical decisions. Serbian
has left open the possibility of exceptions to deference in cases of collusion and
fraud.
3. While the Serbian exception is narrow, it would encompass
this controversy IF the First Church of Christ, Scientist, in Boston, Massachusetts,
were a hierarchical church -- which it is NOT.
4. In an eloquent dissent in
Serbian, Justice Rehnquist outlined the ominous danger of courts according
blind deference to ecclesiastical decisions.
5. Justice Rehnquist warned that
such deference leaves claims to be resolved by brute force. He suggested that blind
deference would transform courts into the "handmaidens of arbitrary lawlessness"
-- Moreover, he raised the specter of establishment clause problems if the coercive
powers of civil courts were used to simply "rubber-stamp ecclesiastical decisions
of hierarchical religious associations, when such deference is not accorded similar
acts of secular voluntary association."
6. The Directors in this dispute
have taken the Church by force. Throughout the years they have consolidated their
domination of the Church by obtaining judicial sanction of their fraudulent organization.
7.
Civil court jurisdiction of this matter is requisite in order to avoid the dangers
articulated by the honorable Justice Rehnquist.